Policing of forums.

Stooo wrote:

Jobless Oddball wrote:

Stooo wrote:

The Police would not investigate if I reported that I had spilt some tea on my carpet as it isn't against the law even though it would be classed as an incident. The Police are obliged to investigate criminal incidents that have been reported to them.

But they wouldn't give you an incident number for the great tea fiasco!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Your point is unmade, you said 'The police HAVE to investigate every incident reported to them' and I merely showed you the error in your statement.

It only becomes an incident once you get an incident number!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Please keep up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jobless Oddball wrote:

Stooo wrote:

Jobless Oddball wrote:

Stooo wrote:

The Police would not investigate if I reported that I had spilt some tea on my carpet as it isn't against the law even though it would be classed as an incident. The Police are obliged to investigate criminal incidents that have been reported to them.

But they wouldn't give you an incident number for the great tea fiasco!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Your point is unmade, you said 'The police HAVE to investigate every incident reported to them' and I merely showed you the error in your statement.

It only becomes an incident once you get an incident number!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Please keep up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm have to point out that it is you that is at error

Quote :

in⋅ci⋅dent
  /ˈɪnsɪdənt/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [in-si-duhnt] Show IPA
Use incident in a Sentence
See web results for incident
See images of incident
–noun
1. an individual occurrence or event.
2. a distinct piece of action, or an episode, as in a story or play.
3. something that occurs casually in connection with something else.
4. something appertaining or attaching to something else.
5. an occurrence of seemingly minor importance, esp. involving nations or factions between which relations are strained and sensitive, that can lead to serious consequences, as an outbreak of hostilities or a war: border incident; international incident.
6. an embarrassing occurrence, esp. of a social nature.
–adjective
7. likely or apt to happen (usually fol. by to).
8. naturally appertaining: hardships incident to the life of an explorer.
9. conjoined or attaching, esp. as subordinate to a principal thing.
10. falling or striking on something, as light rays.
Origin:
1375–1425; late ME < MF < ML incident- (s. of incidēns a happening, n. use of prp. of L incidere to befall), equiv. to L in- in- 2 + -cid- (comb. form of cad- fall) + -ent- -ent; cf. cadence

Stooo wrote:

Jobless Oddball wrote:

Stooo wrote:

Jobless Oddball wrote:

Stooo wrote:

The Police would not investigate if I reported that I had spilt some tea on my carpet as it isn't against the law even though it would be classed as an incident. The Police are obliged to investigate criminal incidents that have been reported to them.

But they wouldn't give you an incident number for the great tea fiasco!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Your point is unmade, you said 'The police HAVE to investigate every incident reported to them' and I merely showed you the error in your statement.

It only becomes an incident once you get an incident number!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Please keep up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm have to point out that it is you that is at error

Quote :

in⋅ci⋅dent
  /ˈɪnsɪdənt/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [in-si-duhnt] Show IPA
Use incident in a Sentence
See web results for incident
See images of incident
–noun
1. an individual occurrence or event.
2. a distinct piece of action, or an episode, as in a story or play.
3. something that occurs casually in connection with something else.
4. something appertaining or attaching to something else.
5. an occurrence of seemingly minor importance, esp. involving nations or factions between which relations are strained and sensitive, that can lead to serious consequences, as an outbreak of hostilities or a war: border incident; international incident.
6. an embarrassing occurrence, esp. of a social nature.
–adjective
7. likely or apt to happen (usually fol. by to).
8. naturally appertaining: hardships incident to the life of an explorer.
9. conjoined or attaching, esp. as subordinate to a principal thing.
10. falling or striking on something, as light rays.
Origin:
1375–1425; late ME < MF < ML incident- (s. of incidēns a happening, n. use of prp. of L incidere to befall), equiv. to L in- in- 2 + -cid- (comb. form of cad- fall) + -ent- -ent; cf. cadence

POLICE INCIDENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jobless Oddball wrote:

Stooo wrote:

Jobless Oddball wrote:

Stooo wrote:

Jobless Oddball wrote:

Stooo wrote:

The Police would not investigate if I reported that I had spilt some tea on my carpet as it isn't against the law even though it would be classed as an incident. The Police are obliged to investigate criminal incidents that have been reported to them.

But they wouldn't give you an incident number for the great tea fiasco!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Your point is unmade, you said 'The police HAVE to investigate every incident reported to them' and I merely showed you the error in your statement.

It only becomes an incident once you get an incident number!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Please keep up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm have to point out that it is you that is at error

Quote :

in⋅ci⋅dent
  /ˈɪnsɪdənt/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [in-si-duhnt] Show IPA
Use incident in a Sentence
See web results for incident
See images of incident
–noun
1. an individual occurrence or event.
2. a distinct piece of action, or an episode, as in a story or play.
3. something that occurs casually in connection with something else.
4. something appertaining or attaching to something else.
5. an occurrence of seemingly minor importance, esp. involving nations or factions between which relations are strained and sensitive, that can lead to serious consequences, as an outbreak of hostilities or a war: border incident; international incident.
6. an embarrassing occurrence, esp. of a social nature.
–adjective
7. likely or apt to happen (usually fol. by to).
8. naturally appertaining: hardships incident to the life of an explorer.
9. conjoined or attaching, esp. as subordinate to a principal thing.
10. falling or striking on something, as light rays.
Origin:
1375–1425; late ME < MF < ML incident- (s. of incidēns a happening, n. use of prp. of L incidere to befall), equiv. to L in- in- 2 + -cid- (comb. form of cad- fall) + -ent- -ent; cf. cadence

POLICE INCIDENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Nowhere in your post did you refer to a Police incident, merely that "The police HAVE to investigate every incident reported to them". You need to be more specific and think before you post.

Stooo wrote:

Nowhere in your post did you refer to a Police incident, merely that "The police HAVE to investigate every incident reported to them". You need to be more specific and think before you post.

So who did you report it to?????????????????????????????????????????????

The butchers????????????????????????????????????????????

Please keep up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jobless Oddball wrote:

Stooo wrote:

Nowhere in your post did you refer to a Police incident, merely that "The police HAVE to investigate every incident reported to them". You need to be more specific and think before you post.

So who did you report it to?????????????????????????????????????????????

The butchers????????????????????????????????????????????

Please keep up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I made it clear as to who it was reported to, you confused yourself by referring to an incident rather than a Police incident. I hope you have learned to be specific in your statements and will learn from this experience.

Stooo wrote:

Jobless Oddball wrote:

Stooo wrote:

Nowhere in your post did you refer to a Police incident, merely that "The police HAVE to investigate every incident reported to them". You need to be more specific and think before you post.

So who did you report it to?????????????????????????????????????????????

The butchers????????????????????????????????????????????

Please keep up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I made it clear as to who it was reported to, you confused yourself by referring to an incident rather than a Police incident. I hope you have learned to be specific in your statements and will learn from this experience.

You assumed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Please don't assume as it'll make you look foolish!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jobless Oddball wrote:

Stooo wrote:

Jobless Oddball wrote:

Stooo wrote:

Nowhere in your post did you refer to a Police incident, merely that "The police HAVE to investigate every incident reported to them". You need to be more specific and think before you post.

So who did you report it to?????????????????????????????????????????????

The butchers????????????????????????????????????????????

Please keep up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I made it clear as to who it was reported to, you confused yourself by referring to an incident rather than a Police incident. I hope you have learned to be specific in your statements and will learn from this experience.

You assumed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Please don't assume as it'll make you look foolish!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You are the one assuming that I assumed. As I have already stated, I merely pointed out the glaring error in your statement.

Stooo wrote:

You are the one assuming that I assumed. As I have already stated, I merely pointed out the glaring error in your statement.

You're assuming again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jobless Oddball wrote:

Stooo wrote:

You are the one assuming that I assumed. As I have already stated, I merely pointed out the glaring error in your statement.

You're assuming again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Merely clarifying your position

Stooo wrote:

Jobless Oddball wrote:

Stooo wrote:

You are the one assuming that I assumed. As I have already stated, I merely pointed out the glaring error in your statement.

You're assuming again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Merely clarifying your position

In the form of an assumption!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jobless Oddball wrote:

Stooo wrote:

Jobless Oddball wrote:

Stooo wrote:

You are the one assuming that I assumed. As I have already stated, I merely pointed out the glaring error in your statement.

You're assuming again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Merely clarifying your position

In the form of an assumption!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You're assuming again, not a good position to take really

Stooo wrote:

You're assuming again, not a good position to take really

I would say that assuming is a better postion to be in than the position you're in!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jobless Oddball wrote:

Stooo wrote:

You're assuming again, not a good position to take really

I would say that assuming is a better postion to be in than the position you're in!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What position would you assume I'm in?

I got a telling off off micky on his forum for not coming in here waving a big stick at you two ...dya think he's after a mods job?

It is unfortunate all of the forums are sniveling snake pits. and quite boring tbh.

leterrip wrote:

It is unfortunate all of the forums are sniveling snake pits. and quite boring tbh.

Been some slippin and sliding for sure.

jack wrote:

leterrip wrote:

It is unfortunate all of the forums are sniveling snake pits. and quite boring tbh.

Been some slippin and sliding for sure.

You'll fit in nicely then

tbh I don't think I a forum person. to much inside activity and shenanigans with little clicks. Politics seem to rule as always.

leterrip wrote:

tbh I don't think I a forum person. to much inside activity and shenanigans with little clicks. Politics seem to rule as always.

I t all got out of hand when micky convinced himself this thread was about him.
It went downhill from there.

Stooo wrote:

What position would you assume I'm in?

I don't assume as I know!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!